paulin/bonobo
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[docs] Fix additional grammar issues at bottom of purity.rst

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Travis Cook
2017-07-21 15:38:06 -07:00
parent 4ef4364f42
commit dda0a63880
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
docs/guide/purity.rst
View File

@ -130,10 +130,10 @@ Now let's see how to do it correctly:
I hear you think «Yeah, but if I create like millions of dicts ...». I hear you think «Yeah, but if I create like millions of dicts ...».
Let's say we chosed the oposite way and copy the dict outside the transformation (in fact, `it's what we did in bonobo's Let's say we chose the opposite way and copied the dict outside the transformation (in fact, `it's what we did in bonobo's
ancestor <https://github.com/rdcli/rdc.etl/blob/dev/rdc/etl/io/__init__.py#L187>`_). This means you will also create the ancestor <https://github.com/rdcli/rdc.etl/blob/dev/rdc/etl/io/__init__.py#L187>`_). This means you will also create the
same number of dicts, the difference is that you won't even notice it. Also, it means that if you want to yield 1 million same number of dicts, the difference is that you won't even notice it. Also, it means that if you want to yield the same
times the same dict, going "pure" makes it efficient (you'll just yield the same object 1 million times) while going "copy dict 1 million times , going "pure" makes it efficient (you'll just yield the same object 1 million times) while going "copy
crazy" will create 1 million objects. crazy" will create 1 million objects.
Using dicts like this will create a lot of dicts, but also free them as soon as all the future components that take this dict Using dicts like this will create a lot of dicts, but also free them as soon as all the future components that take this dict