139 lines
5.2 KiB
ReStructuredText
139 lines
5.2 KiB
ReStructuredText
Services and dependencies (draft implementation)
|
|
================================================
|
|
|
|
:Status: Draft implementation
|
|
:Stability: Alpha
|
|
:Last-Modified: 27 apr 2017
|
|
|
|
Most probably, you'll want to use external systems within your transformations. Those systems may include databases,
|
|
apis (using http, for example), filesystems, etc.
|
|
|
|
You can start by hardcoding those services. That does the job, at first.
|
|
|
|
If you're going a little further than that, you'll feel limited, for a few reasons:
|
|
|
|
* Hardcoded and tightly linked dependencies make your transformations hard to test, and hard to reuse.
|
|
* Processing data on your laptop is great, but being able to do it on different systems (or stages), in different
|
|
environments, is more realistic? You probably want to contigure a different database on a staging environment,
|
|
preprod environment or production system. Maybe you have silimar systems for different clients and want to select
|
|
the system at runtime. Etc.
|
|
|
|
Service injection
|
|
:::::::::::::::::
|
|
|
|
To solve this problem, we introduce a light dependency injection system. It allows to define named dependencies in
|
|
your transformations, and provide an implementation at runtime.
|
|
|
|
Class-based transformations
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
To define a service dependency in a class-based transformation, use :class:`bonobo.config.Service`, a special
|
|
descriptor (and subclass of :class:`bonobo.config.Option`) that will hold the service names and act as a marker
|
|
for runtime resolution of service instances.
|
|
|
|
Let's define such a transformation:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: python
|
|
|
|
from bonobo.config import Configurable, Service
|
|
|
|
class JoinDatabaseCategories(Configurable):
|
|
database = Service('primary_sql_database')
|
|
|
|
def __call__(self, database, row):
|
|
return {
|
|
**row,
|
|
'category': database.get_category_name_for_sku(row['sku'])
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
This piece of code tells bonobo that your transformation expect a sercive called "primary_sql_database", that will be
|
|
injected to your calls under the parameter name "database".
|
|
|
|
Function-based transformations
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
No implementation yet, but expect something similar to CBT API, maybe using a `@Service(...)` decorator.
|
|
|
|
Execution
|
|
---------
|
|
|
|
Let's see how to execute it:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: python
|
|
|
|
import bonobo
|
|
|
|
graph = bonobo.graph(
|
|
*before,
|
|
JoinDatabaseCategories(),
|
|
*after,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
|
bonobo.run(
|
|
graph,
|
|
services={
|
|
'primary_sql_database': my_database_service,
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
A dictionary, or dictionary-like, "services" named argument can be passed to the :func:`bonobo.run` helper. The
|
|
"dictionary-like" part is the real keyword here. Bonobo is not a DIC library, and won't become one. So the implementation
|
|
provided is pretty basic, and feature-less. But you can use much more evolved libraries instead of the provided
|
|
stub, and as long as it works the same (a.k.a implements a dictionary-like interface), the system will use it.
|
|
|
|
Future and proposals
|
|
::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|
|
This is the first proposed implementation and it will evolve, but looks a lot like how we used bonobo ancestor in
|
|
production.
|
|
|
|
May or may not happen, depending on discussions.
|
|
|
|
* Singleton or prototype based injection (to use spring terminology, see
|
|
https://www.tutorialspoint.com/spring/spring_bean_scopes.htm), allowing smart factory usage and efficient sharing of
|
|
resources.
|
|
* Lazily resolved parameters, eventually overriden by command line or environment, so you can for example override the
|
|
database DSN or target filesystem on command line (or with shell environment).
|
|
* Pool based locks that ensure that only one (or n) transformations are using a given service at the same time.
|
|
* Simple config implementation, using a python file for config (ex: bonobo run ... --services=services_prod.py).
|
|
* Default configuration for services, using an optional callable (`def get_services(args): ...`). Maybe tie default
|
|
configuration to graph, but not really a fan because this is unrelated to graph logic.
|
|
* Default implementation for a service in a transformation or in the descriptor. Maybe not a good idea, because it
|
|
tends to push forward multiple instances of the same thing, but we maybe...
|
|
|
|
A few ideas on how it can be implemented, from the user perspective.
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: python
|
|
|
|
# using call
|
|
http = Service('http.client')(requests)
|
|
|
|
# using more explicit call
|
|
http = Service('http.client').set_default_impl(requests)
|
|
|
|
# using a decorator
|
|
@Service('http.client')
|
|
def http(self, services):
|
|
import requests
|
|
return requests
|
|
|
|
# as a default in a subclass of Service
|
|
class HttpService(Service):
|
|
def get_default_impl(self, services):
|
|
import requests
|
|
return requests
|
|
|
|
# ... then use it as another service
|
|
http = HttpService('http.client')
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is under development, let us know what you think (slack may be a good place for this).
|
|
The basics already work, and you can try it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Read more
|
|
:::::::::
|
|
|
|
* See https://github.com/hartym/bonobo-sqlalchemy/blob/work-in-progress/bonobo_sqlalchemy/writers.py#L19 for example usage (work in progress).
|