The current test implementation includes random mutation, single point crossover, and tournament selection. The implementation, in short, is a nested approach. The selection method is the only thing actually called by the GA. Both crossover and mutation occur within the selection method. As long as these three systems all follow a standard input/output system, any implementation we build, as well as any user implementations, will work perfectly. The selection function must take GA as a parameter and output a new population. Crossover takes in GA and outputs a population. Mutation takes a chromosome set and outputs a new chromosome set.
Many of the changes in this commit are regarding this test implementation. I have also changed many of the file names from "x_examples" to "x_types" and updated the class names to follow capitalziation standards. I did this because I feel personally like the built-in mutation, crossover, and selection implementations are less "examples" and more just already built implementations to make the code required from the user smaller.
1) The initialization now accepts "general" inputs that should apply to each gene. For example, rather than a gene input of [1,100] being interpreted to mean gene 1 hsould be 1 and gene 2 should be 100, it will apply a range of [1,100] to each gene.
2) The initialization now accepts "general" gene_input_types. For example, if the user had a set of index-dependent number values, they could just say ga.gene_input_type = "domain" and the package will propagate that across all genes in the chromosome. The user still has the option of defining the entire array or just defining a specific element if they so choose. For later commits, the general gene_input_type will have to be checked for validity; for example, a string can never be a range.
3) Fixed an issue in the ordering of the initialization function call.
4) Added comments surrounding the signfiicant changes to the initialization.
5) Added example tests to the testing file.
